Xt-EHR T7.2 Sub-team for Imaging Reports Model Analysis
Original Project Request
Prompt: "Analyze the Xt-EHR Imaging Report information model to identify which data elements are actually used in real-world imaging reports versus those that could be considered 'beyond basic' by comparing with real-world imaging reports from the PARROT dataset."
Specific Requirements:
- Extract all data elements from Xt-EHR Imaging Report and Study models
- Analyze real-world usage patterns from PARROT dataset
- Map real-world elements to Xt-EHR model elements
- Identify candidates for "beyond basic" classification
- Generate recommendations for basic vs. beyond basic categorization
Live Analysis Dashboard
The dashboard provides: - Interactive data element usage statistics - Real-world vs. model element mappings - Detailed analysis results and recommendations - Downloadable reports and visualizations
Overview
This project provides evidence-based analysis of the Xt-EHR Imaging Report information model by comparing theoretical model elements against real-world usage patterns from the PARROT dataset. Our goal is to identify which data elements are essential for core clinical workflows versus those serving specialized administrative or technical functions.
🤖 AI Analysis Attribution
In accordance with EU AI Act transparency requirements (Article 52):
AI-Assisted Analysis: The data analysis, pattern identification, and report compilation in this project were performed with the assistance of Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic), a large language model and General-Purpose AI system. All findings have been validated against source data from the PARROT v1.0 dataset and Xt-EHR model specifications, and are subject to expert review by the Xt-EHR T7.2 Sub-team.
Scope of AI Involvement: - Analysis of 2,738 real-world imaging reports from PARROT v1.0 dataset - Pattern recognition and element usage frequency calculations - Comparative mapping between real-world data and Xt-EHR model specifications - Classification recommendations (Basic, Intermediate, Beyond Basic categories) - Documentation synthesis and report generation
Human Oversight: All AI-generated analysis and recommendations undergo expert validation and are reviewed within the context of healthcare interoperability standards and clinical practice.
📖 Compliance Resources: - EU AI Act Compliance Statement - Full regulatory compliance documentation - AI Attribution Quick Reference - Attribution templates and FAQ
Analysis Methodology
🔄 Process Flow
graph TB
subgraph "Data Sources"
A[Xt-EHR FHIR IG v0.2.1<br/>EHDS Information Models]
B[PARROT v1.0 Dataset<br/>2,738 Real Reports]
end
subgraph "Model Extraction"
C[Extract Data Elements<br/>Header & Body Structure]
D[Classify Element Types<br/>Required vs Optional]
end
subgraph "Real-World Analysis"
E[Parse Report Content<br/>14 Languages, 21 Countries]
F[Identify Usage Patterns<br/>Modality, Anatomy, Findings]
end
subgraph "Comparative Analysis"
G[Map Real-World to Model<br/>Element Usage Frequency]
H[Gap Analysis<br/>Used vs Unused Elements]
end
subgraph "Evidence-Based Classification"
I[BASIC Elements<br/>11 Core Elements - 90%+ Value]
J[INTERMEDIATE Elements<br/>6 Enhanced Workflow Elements]
K[BEYOND BASIC Elements<br/>31+ Admin/Technical Elements]
end
A --> C
A --> D
B --> E
B --> F
C --> G
D --> G
E --> G
F --> G
G --> H
H --> I
H --> J
H --> K
style A fill:#e1f5fe
style B fill:#f3e5f5
style I fill:#c8e6c9
style J fill:#fff3e0
style K fill:#ffebee
📊 Data Source References
Xt-EHR FHIR Implementation Guide
- Current Version: v0.2.1 (October 10, 2025)
- Main Repository: Xt-EHR/xt-ehr-common
- Issue Tracking: GitHub Issues
- Imaging Report Model: EHDSImagingReport
- Imaging Study Model: EHDSImagingStudy
PARROT Dataset
- Source Repository: PARROT v1.0
- Dataset Scope: 2,738 real-world imaging reports
- Coverage: 14 languages, 21 countries, 10 imaging modalities
- Data Elements: Clinical narratives, ICD codes, modality classifications
🔗 Model Traceability
Our analysis directly references specific elements from the Xt-EHR models:
| Model Section | FHIR Path | Analysis Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| Header Elements | EHDSImagingReport.header.* |
Document metadata, authorship, recipients |
| Order Information | EHDSImagingReport.body.orderInformation.* |
Service requests, clinical context |
| Examination Report | EHDSImagingReport.body.examinationReport.* |
Modality, anatomy, procedures, findings |
| Supporting Info | EHDSImagingReport.body.supportingInformation.* |
Clinical context, medications, devices |
| Study Metadata | EHDSImagingStudy.* |
DICOM metadata, series information |
Data Sources
🏛️ Xt-EHR Information Model
- Official Site: Xt-EHR Project
- FHIR Implementation Guide: EHDS Logical Information Models
- Current Version: v0.2.1 (October 10, 2025) - First preview version of EHDS Logical Information Models
- Development Repository: Xt-EHR/xt-ehr-common
- Imaging Components:
- Imaging Report Model: Comprehensive diagnostic report structure
- Imaging Study Model: DICOM study metadata and organization
📊 PARROT Dataset v1.0
- Source Repository: PARROT-reports/PARROT_v1.0
- Dataset Characteristics:
- Volume: 2,738 real-world imaging reports
- Geographic Coverage: 21 countries across Europe
- Language Diversity: 14 languages
- Modality Coverage: 10 imaging types (CT, MRI, X-ray, etc.)
- Clinical Context: Full diagnostic narratives with ICD code classifications
- Research Purpose: Multi-language dataset enabling evidence-based assessment of imaging report structures
Project Structure
docs/- Documentation and extracted model definitionsanalysis/- Analysis scripts and resultsdata/- Processed data files and extracts (PARROT_v1_0.jsonl)scripts/- Utility scripts for data processingoutput/- Final analysis results and reportsflask_app/- Web application for viewing results (see flask_app/README.md)
Key Findings
Based on comprehensive analysis of 2,738 real-world imaging reports against the Xt-EHR v0.2.1 model specification:
📈 Usage Statistics
- 11 core elements provide 90%+ coverage of real-world clinical value
- 31+ additional elements identified as "beyond basic" candidates
- 100% coverage of essential clinical content (narratives, modalities, anatomy)
- 0% coverage of administrative metadata in real-world reports
🎯 Evidence-Based Classification
| Category | Element Count | Clinical Coverage | Implementation Complexity |
|---|---|---|---|
| BASIC | 11 elements | 90%+ clinical value | Low - immediate interoperability |
| INTERMEDIATE | 6 elements | Enhanced workflows | Medium - use case driven |
| BEYOND BASIC | 31+ elements | Administrative/technical | High - specialized requirements |
🔍 Detailed Mappings
Available in analysis documents with complete traceability to source models and real-world evidence.
Web Interface
A Flask web application provides interactive access to all analysis results:
cd flask_app
python app.py
Features:
- Document library with search and categorization
- Mobile-first responsive design
- PDF export with selectable orientations
- Real-time analysis dashboard
See flask_app/README.md for detailed setup and deployment instructions.
Implementation Strategy
📋 Phase 1: Basic Profile (Recommended Start)
Target: Core 11 elements for immediate clinical value
- Complexity: Low implementation burden
- Coverage: 90%+ of real-world clinical needs
- ROI: Very high - maximum value with minimal effort
🔧 Phase 2: Enhanced Profile (Use Case Driven)
Target: Additional 6 intermediate elements - Complexity: Medium - specific workflow integration - Coverage: Enhanced clinical context and workflows - ROI: Medium-High - targeted value for specific use cases
🏢 Phase 3: Comprehensive Profile (Enterprise/Regulatory)
Target: Full model implementation including beyond basic elements - Complexity: High - complete administrative and technical infrastructure - Coverage: Full workflow support and regulatory compliance - ROI: Low-Medium - justified only for specialized institutional needs
Regulatory Compliance
🇪🇺 EU AI Act Compliance
This project operates in accordance with the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (Regulation EU 2024/1689), which establishes harmonized rules for trustworthy AI in Europe.
Classification: Limited Risk (Transparency Requirements) - AI-assisted analysis for healthcare data model evaluation - Transparency obligations fulfilled through clear AI attribution - Subject to human oversight and expert validation
Key Resources: - 📋 EU AI Act - European Commission - 🇮🇪 Irish Implementation - Enterprise Ireland - 🏛️ European Approach to AI - 📖 Project Compliance Statement - Detailed compliance documentation
Timeline Context: - AI Act entered into force: 2 August 2024 - Transparency requirements (Article 52): In effect - GPAI obligations: 2 August 2025 - Full application: 2 August 2026
This project aligns with the European Health Data Space (EHDS) initiative and supports trustworthy AI principles in healthcare interoperability.
Acknowledgments
This project builds upon the work of several important initiatives:
🏛️ Xt-EHR Project
- Source: Xt-EHR Official Site | GitHub Repository
- Version Analyzed: v0.2.1 (October 10, 2025)
- Contribution: The Xt-EHR FHIR Implementation Guide provides the comprehensive imaging report data model that serves as the basis for this classification analysis. The detailed specification enables systematic comparison with real-world usage patterns and supports evidence-based implementation guidance.
- Reference: Xt-EHR Joint Action - EHDS Logical Information Models for cross-border health data exchange
📊 PARROT Project
- Source: PARROT v1.0 Dataset
- Contribution: The PARROT v1.0 dataset provides the foundational real-world data for this analysis. This comprehensive collection of 2,738 multi-language imaging reports across 14 languages and 21 countries enables evidence-based assessment of actual clinical usage patterns.
- Reference: PARROT v1.0 - A multi-language dataset of real-world radiology reports for research purposes
🤖 AI Analysis Tools
- Model: Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic)
- Classification: General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Model under EU AI Act
- Role: AI-assisted data analysis, pattern recognition, and report compilation
- Governance: Subject to EU AI Act transparency requirements and human oversight
- Contribution: Enabled efficient analysis of large-scale dataset (2,738 reports) with comprehensive pattern identification and automated documentation generation
🔗 Model Provenance
Our analysis maintains full traceability to source materials: - Xt-EHR Elements: Direct references to FSH model definitions - Real-World Evidence: Quantitative analysis of PARROT dataset usage patterns - AI-Assisted Classification: Evidence-based justification validated by domain experts - Regulatory Compliance: Aligned with EU AI Act and EHDS frameworks
We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of all projects and tools in enabling this comparative analysis and advancing standardized, trustworthy health data exchange.
License
This project is part of the Xt-EHR T7.2 Sub-team analysis work.
Development Environment
Prerequisites
- Python 3.12+
- Git
Quick Start
# Clone and setup
git clone <repository-url>
cd "FHIR Imaging Report"
# For web app setup, see flask_app/README.md
Team
Xt-EHR T7.2 Sub-team for Imaging Reports Model